The logical outcome of money, is like a marble machine with a single person perpetually scooping marbles up from the bottom of the machine, to pour them into the top.
Ultimately, it’s his job to maintain the system, and keep the participants in line. This implies a grand conspiracy. Such a grand conspiracy can’t be true, as someone would know and tell everyone. Right?
Firstly, the fundamental problem is the money, not the person. Meaning, even if you found them and took them out nothing would change. Secondly, the secrecy part we’ll have to deal with in another post. We are more than we appear. Also, there are no marbles in the the economy.
In addition, ChatGpt desperately wants me to not claim that there exists an actual boogie man. In my boo, The Path to Heaven, I claim that he exists, and that he is you. As I’ve said before, we are One Being. If and when you realize your true nature. Then you’ll recall that you are the one who planned this. He is us.
A conspiracy can be proved with available information, if and only if you understand the driving force of the system; investments. Even this is a point of contention.
Speak to two different experts, and you’ll get two definitions of an investment. It’s on purpose, as investments are the gateway to escaping the system. You will find lies and confusion around any truth that would undo this monstrosity.
The system is ours, and we are the big bad wolf. When you come to know yourself, the things that you refused to look at will become apparent.
An investment is something that produces something for the person who owns the asset. Buying something and holding it, isn’t an investment, it’s a gamble. You’re hoping that someone down the line will pay you more for the thing that you bought.
When you exclude buying and holding assets as an investment vehicle, what’s left? Nothing for anyone who isn’t already rich! Most real investments are in the million dollar range. Well beyond the means of the average person.
How can I prove the conspiracy? Money is immortal, encouraging hoarding. Since it has no utility, it just sits idly in the accounts of the wealthy. There has been a two tiered economy for thousands of years. Because those with wealth only spend their money with other wealthy people. Creating economic loops. But buying and selling investments seems to be cut and dry. If you’re buying and someone is selling, then everything balances out in the end. On the surface this is correct.
The real issue are investments that produce currency. If your investment continuously produces paper. You can easily graph this as a linear equation y=mx+b.
If you then use your income and profits to purchase more investments that also produce money. The you will have a rate of increasing rates of money. This is a parabolic equation y=ax^2+bx+c.
If you remember from school, there are issues with parabolic equations. As x increases, y grows faster and faster. It doesn’t stabilize. It accelerates. This is called the vertical asymptote.
How is this a problem, and how does it prove a conspiracy?
If even one person has a rate of income that is going parabolic, it will stress the entire system, because money is limited. There isn’t an infinite amount of money. In a system with limited resources, this kind of growth cannot continue forever. If someone goes parabolic, it must crash the system.
What about the conspiracy? You just need to ask yourself some questions, and let them sit? Are there two different people going parabolic in money battling for supremacy? The answer came quick didn’t it. I can’t prove there’s only one, with the limit resources that I have. But I can feel it.
How about this? What does it look like when a person is going parabolic in the economy? Does it look like now?
The people at the top, are right now, frantically spending money. But that money is simply headed straight to the top, further accelerating the vertical asymptote. While money dries up everywhere else. Eventually, the rate of the infinite one will outpace everyone else to the point where the system implodes.
What would happen if anyone threatens economic loop of our antagonist?